RESUMO
BackgroundCOVID-19 vaccination is a key prevention strategy to reduce the spread and severity of SARS-CoV-2 infections, especially among highly exposed healthcare workers (HCWs). However, vaccine-related inability to work among HCWs could overstrain healthcare systems. MethodsThis study examined sick leave and intake of pro re nata (PRN) medication after the first, second and third COVID-19 vaccination in HCWs. Subgroup analyses were performed for different vaccines, gender, healthcare professions, and for HCWs aged at least 30 years. Data was collected by using an electronic questionnaire. FindingsAmong 1,704 HCWs enrolled, in total 595 (34{middle dot}9%) HCWs were on sick leave following at least one COVID-19 vaccination, leading to a total number of 1,550 sick days. Both the absolute sick days and the rate of HCWs on sick leave significantly increased with each subsequent vaccination. Comparing BNT162b2mRNA and mRNA-1273 the difference in sick leave was not significant after the second dose, but mRNA-1273 induced a significantly longer and more frequent sick leave after the third. InterpretationA considerable number of HCWs have been on sick leave after COVID-19 vaccination, staff absences increase with each additional dose, depend on the vaccine, and vary between HCWs gender, and profession. In the light of further COVID-19 infection waves and booster vaccinations, there is a risk of additional staff shortages due to post-vaccination inability to work, which could acutely overload healthcare systems and jeopardise patient care. These findings will aid further vaccination campaigns to minimise the impact of staff absences on the healthcare system. FundingThis study was funded by the Federal Ministry for Education and Science (BMBF) via a grant provided to the University Hospital of Wuerzburg by the Network University Medicine on COVID-19 (B-FAST, grant-No 01KX2021) as well as by the Free State of Bavaria with COVID-research funds provided to the University of Wuerzburg, Germany. Nils Petri is supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) funded scholarship UNION CVD.
RESUMO
BackgroundA third dose of COVID-19 vaccination ( COVID booster vaccination) has become established as an important measure to strengthen the immune response against SARS-CoV-2. In contrast, seasonal influenza vaccination has been an important infection prevention measure for years, especially among highly exposed healthcare workers (HCWs). Coadministration of vaccines against COVID-19 and seasonal influenza could be an efficient strategy to protect HCWs from two major viral respiratory infections. Yet, the immunogenicity and safety of coadministration remains to be evaluated. MethodsThis study examines the differences in Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG antibody formation as well as side effects based on a digital questionnaire after a third COVID-19 vaccination with or without coadministration of a seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine (Influvac Tetra vaccine 2021/2022). 1,231 HCWs were recruited who received a mRNA-based booster COVID-19 vaccination (mRNA-1273 or BNT162b2mRNA) after basic immunisation with BNT162b2mRNA twice. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG levels were determined at least 14 days after vaccination by SERION ELISA agile SARS-CoV-2 IgG. FindingsAnti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG concentrations were by 25{middle dot}4% lower in individuals with coadministration of the seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccination than without (p<0{middle dot}01). There was no statistically significant difference in the reported side effects. The concentration of Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG was higher in HCWs who had received the influenza vaccine concomitantly with mRNA-1273 than with BNT162b2mRNA as third COVID-19 vaccine (p<0{middle dot}0001). InterpretationCoadministration of the seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine significantly limits the levels in Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG levels, with a more restricted elevation in case of a BNT162b2mRNA booster vaccination compared with mRNA-1273 vaccine. The reduced humoral immune response in case of coadministration needs to be considered in seasonal vaccination recommendations, although the consequences of lower Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG levels for the protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease course are currently unknown. An augmented mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine dosage may compensate for the restricted immunogenicity in case of coadministration. FundingThis study was funded by the Federal Ministry for Education and Science (BMBF) through a grant provided to the University Hospital of Wuerzburg by the Network University Medicine on COVID-19 (B-FAST, grant-No 01KX2021) as well as by the Free State of Bavaria with COVID-research funds provided to the University of Wuerzburg, Germany. Nils Petri is supported by the German Research Foundation (DFG) funded scholarship UNION CVD. Research in contextO_ST_ABSEvidence before this studyC_ST_ABSFor evaluation of the previously published evidence, PubMed and medRxiv were searched for the terms "influenza vaccination", "influenza vaccine", "influenza", "flu", "seasonality", combined with "coadministration", "concomitant", "COVID-19 vaccination", "COVID-19 vaccine", "SARS-CoV-2", in title or abstract, published between 1st of January 2020 and 18th of May 2022. To date, it is unclear if coadministration of COVID-19 and influenza vaccine is effective and safe, particularly in the cohort of healthcare workers (HCWs) as key public health stakeholders. For the subunit COVID-19 vaccine NVX-CoV2373, an impairment of Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG levels has been shown in individuals coadministered with a seasonal influenza vaccine. The two previously published studies on coadministration of a mRNA-based COVID-19 and a seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine have reported a restriction of humoral Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike immune response in the coadministration group. These examinations were conducted with limited correspondence to real-life conditions and in smaller cohorts. Additionally, these former studies do not consider the important aspect of side effects as a possible direct effect of the prevention measure on the availability of public health care in combination with Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG levels. In summary, the humoral immunogenicity and side effects of a coadministered third COVID-19 and a seasonal influenza vaccine are still unclear and the limited available data is not transferable to the general public. Added value of this studyWe performed the first large-scale real-life evaluation of humoral immunogenicity and side effects of COVID-19 and influenza vaccine coadministration in HCWs. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG levels were significantly lower in the coadministered cohort compared to the not coadministered control group, stratified by third COVID-19 vaccine (BNT162b2mRNA or mRNA-1273). Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG post-vaccine elevation was lower among BNT162b2mRNA vaccinated HCWs than in those vaccinated with mRNA-1273 as a third COVID-19 vaccination. The influence of the seasonal quadrivalent influenza vaccine is evaluated in a cohort including 1,231 HCWs in total, covering a broad age range. Coadministration did not lead to an increase in side effects, which is a central requirement for considering the option of coadministration, given the role of HCWs as key personnel in maintaining health care capacities. Implications of all the available evidenceOur data suggest, that coadministration of third mRNA-based COVID-19 and quadrivalent seasonal influenza vaccine is safe and immunogenic, although it leads to a slightly reduced Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike antibody formation. While the clinical impact of the observed reduction in humoral Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike immune response for protection against SARS-CoV-2 infection and severe COVID-19 disease is still unclear, influenza vaccination remains an important infection prevention measure, especially among highly exposed HCWs. The coadministration does not increase side effects but may improve vaccination rate. A higher-dosed mRNA-based COVID-19 vaccine may compensate for the restricted immunogenicity in case of seasonal influenza vaccine coadministration. Our results will support the development of public health recommendations for coadministration of COVID-19 and influence vaccines in anticipation of the imminent infection waves in the coming winter season.
RESUMO
BackgroundAgainst the background of the current COVID-19 infection dynamics with the rapid spread of SARS-CoV-2 variants of concern (VOC), above all the Omicron VOC, the immunity of healthcare workers (HCWs) against SARS-CoV-2 continues to be of high importance. Vaccination plays a central role in reducing the severity and potentially the spread of the disease. In healthcare, this is important to prevent disease-related staff shortages. However, there is a lack of data on factors influencing the humoral immune response. AimThe aim of our study was to determine factors influencing the level of Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG after SARS-CoV-2 infection or vaccination in healthcare workers. Methods1,750 study participants were recruited who met the following inclusion criteria: age [≥] 18 years, PCR-confirmed SARS-CoV-2 infection and/or at least one dose of COVID-19 vaccination, working in health care. Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG titres were determined by SERION ELISA agile SARS-CoV-2 IgG. ResultsMean Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG levels increased significantly with the number of COVID-19 vaccinations (92.2 BAU/ml for single dose, 140.9 BAU/ml for two doses and 1,144.3 BAU/ml after threefold vaccination). Hybrid COVID-19 immunized respondents (after infection and vaccination) had significantly higher antibody titres compared with participants after infection only (525.4 BAU/ml vs. 105.7 BAU/ml). Anti-SARS-CoV-2-Spike IgG titres declined significantly with time after administration of the second vaccine dose. Smoking and high age were associated with lower titres. ConclusionBoth recovered and vaccinated HCWs presented a predominantly good humoral immune response with decreasing antibody levels over the temporal course. Smoking and higher age limited the humoral SARS-CoV-2 immunity. This reduced immune response is an important aspect as people with these risk factors are recognized as people with an increased risk for a severe course of disease.
